The Gulf War from the American perspective Essay

The disconnect War from the American sight - Essay ExampleIn any case, once thing is clear the publicly stated reasons of Iraq struggle were not digestible to many people. This paper analyses Gulf War from American perspectives. George Bush thought that Gulf War may help him to win the presidential election once again. He thought that this fight might help him and his party (Republicans) to increase the popularity and hence he may get an easy snap bean in the coming presidential election. However, Bill Clinton proved that such beliefs were wrong. Clinton successfully made the economy the douse in the next election and managed to win it1. For years ibn Talal Hussein received US support epoch committing atrocities. His was not the only government committing atrocities. His atrocities were never publicly discussed until he invaded Kuwait2. The invasion of Kuwait brought ibn Talal Hussein Hussein into the public lime light. It was difficult for America to justify ibn Talal Hussein further. It should be noted that nation is prevailing in America and America believes themselves as the saviour of human rights. Under such circumstances, it was out(predicate) for America to stay blind while Iraq was questioning the sovereignty of an independent country. Moreover, many Americans thought that Saddam is trying to become another Hitler. Increased influence of Saddam in the Middle East was not good for the American interests. Saddam was repeatedly comp ared to Hitler. Then he was publicly defied and demeaned. The president said he has had it with Sadm Hussein. Under U. S. leadership, the world was mobilized against him3. America suspected the possibility of another world war unless they prevent Saddam from conquering neighbouring countries. It should be noted that the military power of other gulf countries were negligible in confront of Iraqs military power at that time. In short, many people believe that America attacked Iraq to carry through the world from the po ssibility of another world war. Another tilt claims that America attacked Iraq to control the oil resources. However, this argument seems to be far from reality since Americas oil imports from Iraq account only 5% of the native zero needs in America. There are plenty of other countries in this world which imprecate heavily on Iraqi oil resources for their energy needs. So oil is not the whole answer. opposite possible aspects of the answer include a new world order, collective security, interdependence, prevention of regional hegemony, and reversal of American decline4. Even though Iraqi oil does not cause much command problems to America, it has the potential to cause indirect economic problems in America. If Saddam Hussein had raised oil prices to $27 a barrel, the increase in our import bill would have been about $20 billion a year, or less than one half of one percent of GNP. The greater harm comes when sudden rises begin the economy, but this effect is harder to estimat e. Some economists believe that a temporary oil price of $40 a barrel, for example, helped to trigger the recession, which represented a loss of several percent of GNP5. U.S. policy toward the Middle East is characterized by an intention to ultimately control the oil there, and keep other powers--not just the Soviet Union, but too Britain and France--away, if not dependent on the United States6. It is a fact that oil resources in America are rapidly exhausting even though the demand for oil increases. The oil needs or the energy